Reasoning beyond belief acquisition

I argue that we can reason not only to new beliefs but basically any change in attitude think of, including the abandonment of belief (contra John Broome), acquisition non-belief attitudes like relief and admiration, elimination same. To for this position, which call generalism, defend a sufficient condition on reasoning, roughly is expressed by conclusion an argument be convinced by. then produce examples such arguments, they are indeed arguments. non-doxastic attitudes, develop idea state attitudinal constraint acceptance, show how it useful solving problem, other parts philosophy as well.